Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PAULINO v. BALLY'S CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
JOSE PAULINO
Defendant:
BALLY'S CORPORATION, ABC COMPANIES 1-10, SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS and PREMIER ENTERTAINMENT AC, LLC, A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF BALLY'S CORPORATION,
Cross Defendant:
JOHN DOE1-5, SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Paulino v. Rickard
as 9:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
Jose Paulino
Respondent:
E. Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Argueta-Martinez v. Rosen
as 21-60026
Respondent:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jose Paulino Argueta-Martinez
Jose Argueta-Martinez v. William Barr
as 20-2100
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Petitioner:
JOSE PAULINO ARGUETA-MARTINEZ, a/k/a Robert Rivera-Carpio
Castillo v. JP Enterprises of Tampa, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02832
Plaintiff:
Ruben Castillo
Defendant:
JP Enterprises of Tampa, Inc. , Nidia Ramirez , German Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jose Paulino-Mena v. Attorney General United State
as 14-1658
Petitioner:
JOSE PAULINO-MENA, AKA Juandedi Paulino
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paulino-Ramirez v. Holder
as 12-4902
Petitioner:
Jose Arismendy Paulino-Ramirez, AKA Jose Paulino
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Hernandez et al v. New China Panda Super Buffet, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01047
Defendant:
Yue Ying Chen, Ai Guo Jiang and New China Panda Super Buffet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Gonzalez, Mario Hernandez, Ricardo Martagon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Paulino Duran v. Holder
as 12-825
Petitioner:
Anlet Jose Paulino Duran
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chavez v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv03204
Petitioner:
Jose Paulino Chavez
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
