Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10532
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GARY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. City of Centre Alabama
as 4:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stacy Jones
Defendant:
City of Centre Alabama and Centre, Alabama, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jones v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02454
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Jones v. McComas et al
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clayton Jones and Clay Jones
Defendant:
Joseph McComas and Rutherford County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00899
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Jones
Defendant:
Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01723
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C JONES and JOSEPH JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ali v. The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv03893
Plaintiff:
Naureen Ali
Defendant:
The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, James McClane, Joshua Nicholas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 22-40631
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Neal Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jones v. Stanley et al
as 5:2022ct03334
Plaintiff:
Joseph O. Jones
Defendant:
Drew Stanley, Talena Lee, Jennifer Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
