Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Cross v. Hall
as 5:2010hc02250
Petitioner:
Thomas Franklin Cross, Jr.
Respondent:
Joseph Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baggett v. Keller et al
as 5:2010hc02226
Petitioner:
William Baggett
Respondent:
Alvin Keller, Joseph Hall and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv05172
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hall and Joseph Hall
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, irene singleton and Edward Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Joseph Hall
as 10-10211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH HALL
EMMONS et al v. ARTEVA SPECIALTIES, S.A.R.L. et al
as 2:2009cv93314
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HALL EMMONS, JR. and SANDRA DEAN EMMONS
Defendant:
CNA HOLDINGS, INC. , HNA HOLDINGS, INC., FIBER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wood, et al v. City of Macon, GA, et al
as 5:2000cv00515
Plaintiff:
John E. Wood , James J. Wood , Joe Allen and others
Defendant:
Macon, Georgia , C. Jack Ellis , Melvin Waldrop and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Steve Draper , Wayne Avery , Chris Bartlett and others
Consol_defendant:
Macon, Georgia , Melvin Waldrop , Ben Hubbard and others
Objector:
NAACP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
USA v. Joseph Hall
as 09-10216
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH HALL
FOWLER v. HALL
as 1:2009cv00248
Respondent:
JOSEPH HALL
Petitioner:
SHARAY L. FOWLER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Griffin v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2006cv00327
Petitioner:
Lovell Griffin
Respondent:
Jim Rubenstein, Bobby Hamricks, Bluefield Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
