Cases 1 - 10 of 19
M.D. v. Mahoning County, Ohio, et al.
as 4:2026cv00544
Plaintiff:
M.D.
Defendant:
Mahoning County, Ohio, Damon K. Perry, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.D. v. Mahoning County, Ohio et al.
as 4:2025cv02414
Plaintiff:
M.D.
Defendant:
Mahoning County, Ohio, Damon K. Perry, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown v. Wier et al
as 7:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
Judge Robert Wier, Chief Judge Danny Reeves and Senior Judge Joseph Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hood v. USA
as 5:2023cv81541
Petitioner:
Charles Joseph Hood
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27686
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13418
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stone v. Mahoning County, et al.
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Mary Stone
Defendant:
Mahoning County, William Cappabianca, Kenneth Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GOODMAN v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11780
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GOODMAN, BRANDON KOENIG-MESSER, RYAN LOIBL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Goodman, Brandon Koenig-Messer, Ryan Loibl and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
