Cases 21 - 30 of 34
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56691
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03416
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBBS et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03067
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BEAGLES, JAMES SMITH, OZZIE JENKINS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibbs et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02040
Plaintiff:
Richard Beagles, James Smith, Ozzie Jenkins and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Saxton et al v. R.M. et al
as 3:2017cv05926
Plaintiff:
Leticia Saxton, Randy McCon and R.M.
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Joshua Evans and Santiago Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Maury County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Joshua Evans
Defendant:
Maury County Jail and Bucky Rawland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bachelor et al v. Evans
as 6:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Bachelor and Richard D. Bachelor
Defendant:
Joshua Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Robinson Harris et al
as 4:2015cv00688
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Shawndra L. Robinson Harris, Conloudes Robinson, Joshua Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT et al
as 2:2015cv00110
Petitioner:
JOSHUA EVANS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and JOHN KERESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
