Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. CPL (MEADOWVIEW) LLC et al
as 1:2016cv04856
Plaintiff:
JOYCE M. JACKSON
Defendant:
CPL (MEADOWVIEW) LLC and JOHN DOE PARTIES AND/OR BUSINESS ENTITIES (PLURAL 1-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Jackson v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Joyce M. Jackson
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01173
Plaintiff:
Joyce Ivy Jackson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2008cv01970
Plaintiff:
Joyce E. Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Primeau et al v. Pride Mobility Products Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00538
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Lynn Primeau, Charlotte Lynn Primeau, Joyce Marie Jackson and others
Defendant:
Pride Mobility Products Corp. and Lakewood Engineering Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
