Cases 1 - 10 of 7,635
Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase N.A.
as 8:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Randall v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Jack Randall and Beverly Randall
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds, Cannon Perdue and JP Segura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JP Ecommerce Inc. v. Chelsie Rafieha
as 2:2024cv03578
Plaintiff:
JP Ecommerce, Inc.
Defendant:
Chelsie Rafieha
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
DUNN et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 2:2024cv03504
Plaintiff:
JON DUNN and Laura Dunn
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
M&T Bank v. Chryssoula Arsenis, et al
as 24-1723
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK, other Hudson City Savings Bank
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald B Williams, Mary Williams, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
John Morris Anderson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORRIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
MANDAL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
SMRITIMAY MANDAL
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Langford v. JPMorgan Chase Co. et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Langford
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Co., Ashley Unknown, Jackie Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
