Cases 1 - 10 of 1,034
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jonathan Gould v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 24-1704
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOULD
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McBride v. YA'cup et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dytaniel McBride and Dytaniel L McBride
Defendant:
John R YA'cup, Brian L Berntson, Bradley Dixon and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ponton et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co et al
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ponton, Sr, Tomika Ponton, Ronald Ponton, Sr doing business as Mexico Moving Company and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOL (America) Inc. v. Capital One Bank (USA) NA et al
as 4:2024mc05568
Plaintiff:
MOL (America), Inc.
Garnishee:
Capital One Bank (USA) NA and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Yraceburu et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Hollianne Yraceburu and Jacob Yraceburu
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
