Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States of America v. $30,695.00 United States currency seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account NO. 3982871197
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$30,695.00 United States currency seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Account NO. 3982871197
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $909,708.64 IN U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM A SUBLEDGER AT CITIBANK, N.A. PREVIOUSLY HELD IN ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7108, IN THE NAME OF NTGH 2A AUTO TRADE, INC, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$909,708.64 IN U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM A SUBLEDGER AT CITIBANK, N.A. PREVIOUSLY HELD IN ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7108, IN THE NAME OF NTGH 2A AUTO TRADE, INC, LLC and $69,003.39 IN U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM A SUSPENSE ACCOUNT AT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., PREVIOUSLY HELD IN ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0913, IN THE NAME OF SIGLO EXPORT IMPORT 22 CORP,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
United States of America v. $530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$530,838.57 UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TOTAL BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT ENDING IN 1033, HELD IN THE NAME OF ALLURE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
Claimant:
Nina Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $132,183.44 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX2353 et al
as 2:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$132,183.44 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX2353, $1,019,076.76 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX9249, $40,000.00 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX9206 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Approximately $71,827.20 in Funds seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $71,827.20 in Funds seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $79,303.69 on deposit in the Bank of America, N.A. Account Number 5505885178 et al
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$79,303.69 on deposit in the Bank of America, N.A. Account Number 5505885178, $58,097.74 on deposit in TD Bank Account Number 4284688525, $88,881.02 on deposit in PNC Bank Account Number 8622104361 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $43,214.91 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 3133137295 IN THE NAME OF CHEE NOU HER AT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2013cv05536
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$43,214.91 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 3133137295 IN THE NAME OF CHEE NOU HER AT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE 2010 JAGUAR XKR et al
as 2:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ONE 2010 JAGUAR XKR, $489,541.79 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, $54,738.90 CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 110075034765 IN THE NAME AND/OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF IKE B. AHN AND/OR DANIEL AHN, AT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 55 W. PALISADE AVENUE, ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. 7,206,157,717 on Deposit at JP
as 11-2898
Defendant:
7,206,157,717 on Deposit at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., in the Accounts set forth on schedule A
Petitioner / Appellant:
Adele Fox
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. 7,206,157,717 on Deposit at JP
as 11-2898
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Movant - Appellant:
Adele Fox
Defendant:
7,206,157,717 on Deposit at JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., in the Accounts set forth on schedule A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
