Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Davis v Joe Miller, Inc., et al
as 4:2023cv40098
Defendant:
Joe Miller, Inc., Miller Fence Company, Inc., Joe Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Jon Davis
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548 Unfair and Deceptive Trade Acts
GOICOECHEA v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 2:2023cv03900
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOICOECHEA
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and JOHN DOES 1-5 and 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
McRae v. JPMorgan Chase
as 23-1111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYLVIA MCRAE
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., AKA JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., AKA Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
