Cases 11 - 20 of 389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Juan VegaIn re: Juan Vega
as 23-11773
Petitioner:
In re: JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gonzalez v. PAR Electrical Contractor, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02185
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Gonzalez and Juan Gonzalez
Defendant:
PAR Electrical Contractor, LLC, William F. Lander, John Doe Maintenance Service Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Vega v. Carner et al
as 2:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Vega
Defendant:
Jon P. Carner, Dakota Cardenas, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Lopez-Munoz
as 23-40154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Francisco Lopez-Munoz
United States of America v. Cuartas Villegas
as 23-6152
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO CUARTAS VILLEGAS and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PABLO EFRAIN CAMERO BERNAL, JOSE MARIA CASTILLO BERRIO and JESUS ALBERTO MORELO CASTILLO
USA v. Galvan-Hernandez
as 23-40042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Galvan-Hernandez, also known as Juan Francisco Galvan-Hernandez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Juan Argueta-Marquez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2218
Petitioner:
JUAN FRANCISCO ARGUETA-MARQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
