Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Richard Chichakli v. USA, et al
as 20-10018
Defendant / Appellee:
URS CORPORATION FEDERAL SERVICE DIVISION OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA, JUSTICE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, MICHAEL DONDARSKI, Assistant Director of Enforcement OFAC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. CHICHAKLI
Jason Dent v. DOJ, et al
as 19-5221
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Marshal Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Dent
DENT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv02153
Defendant:
CRIMINAL DIVISION, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Chichakli v. United States of America, et al
as 3:2019cv00372
Plaintiff:
Richard A Chichakli
Defendant:
DEA, Federal Tort Claims Act Section, Justice Management Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DENT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02838
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02268
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESERT-MOUNTAIN REGION -- BARSTOW OFFICE, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Steven Corbin v. Lee J. Loftus and JMO Finance
as 16-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN T. CORBIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE J. LOFTUS AND JMO FINANCE STAFF, Department of Justice/Justice Management Division and TILTON & BERNSTEIN MANAGEMENT
Sinito, Frank v. DOJ, et al
as 98-5227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas J. Sinito
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Office, Office of the Deputy Attorney General and others
Appellant:
Frank Sinito, Next-of-Kin of Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
