Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Ashley v. Moore, et al.
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
G. ASHLEY
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, JUSTIN PETERS, Officer, No. 37708, EDGAR MURO, Officer, No. 36863 and others
Tidriri v. The Board of Regents et al
as 4:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Moulay Tidriri
Defendant:
The Board of Regents, Iowa State University, Mary Vermeer Andringa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
NOWAKOWSKI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04396
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PETER NOWAKOWSKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERS v. FC FUNDING et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PETERS, JR
Defendant:
FC FUNDING doing business as FLAGSHIP CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LLC, HIDE N SEEK TOWING & RECOVERY, RAP FINANCIAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SHELTON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2021cv02984
Plaintiff:
RENEE SHELTON
Defendant:
JUSTIN PETERS, CITY OF MUNCIE and CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09252
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren v. West et al
as 1:2020cv01066
Defendant:
Nathan West, Jane Doe, Jane Landrigan and others
Plaintiff:
Shawndale Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. West et al
as 3:2020cv00380
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Nathan West, Jane Landrigan and others
Plaintiff:
Shawndale Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3265
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Roger Maddux and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
