Cases 11 - 20 of 668
United States of America v. Mayorga-Jacinto
as 24-771
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
INMER ISAI MAYORGA-JACINTO
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas v. Becerra
as 4:2023cv04799
Plaintiff:
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast, Ascension Providence, Ascension Seton d/b/a Ascension Seton Hays and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Hernandez Oxlaj v. Garland
as 24-270
Petitioner:
JOSE JACINTO HERNANDEZ OXLAJ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Delgado v. Metro Floor Demo LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
CESAR ORTIZ DELGADO
Defendant:
METRO FLOOR DEMO LLC, EDGAR MACIAS and JACINTO MACIAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. Putnam et al
as 4:2023cv04026
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kenneth Putnam, Amber Ochoa, Marcus Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo et al v. Deglandon et al
as 9:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Perez Trujilo and Jacinto De La Garza Valdez
Defendant:
Cody Deglandon, Thomas Austin, Danna Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
IN RE: ARC Airbag Inflators Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2022md03051
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mann, Jimmy Mann, Richard Topa and others
Defendant:
Arc Automotive, Inc., General Motors LLC, Kia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Acevedo-Rojas v. Garland
as 23-364
Petitioner:
JACINTO ACEVEDO-ROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
