Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Cedric Alexander v. Barcardi and Company, et al
as 16-11717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC MARK ALEXANDER, On behalf of self and all others similarly situated, also known as Sidric Mark Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
BARCARDI AND COMPANY, MCCORMICK DISTILLING COMPANY, DIAGEO BEVERAGE and others
Alexander v. Barcardi and Company et al
as 3:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Cedric Mark Alexander
Defendant:
Barcardi and Company, McCormick Distilling Co, Diageo Beverage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rarrick v. Isaacs et al
as 1:2016cv00393
Defendant:
Kiley Bergstrom, Dan Bunch, William Bunch and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Rarrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIEL v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
JACK DANIEL
Defendant:
FRANCIS DOUGHERTY and FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DANIELS et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
JACK DANIELS, JR and ANITA DANIELS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sazerac Brands, LLC et al v. Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00849
Plaintiff:
Sazerac Brands, LLC and Sazerac Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Rarrick v. Bunch et al
as 1:2015cv02050
Defendant:
Kiley Bergstrom, Hon William Bunch, C.A.R.E.S. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Rarrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PARSONS et al v. JACK DANIELS MOTORS LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00680
Plaintiff:
VERA PARSONS and JOE PARSONS
Defendant:
JACK DANIELS MOTORS LLC , PORSCHE MOTORS NORTH AMERICA INC. , NORTH ATLANTIC DISTRIBUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel's Properties Incorporated
as 2:2014cv02057
Plaintiff:
VIP Products LLC
Defendant:
Jack Daniel's Properties Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
