Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Daniels and Dr. Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Perales v. Jack Daniels, et al
as 23-2587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Perales
Defendant / Appellee:
Jack Daniels, Chief Psychiatrist, et al. and Dionne Hart, Staff Psychiatrist, et al.
Perales v. Daniels et al
as 0:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Perales
Defendant:
Jack Daniels and Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 5:2023ct03092
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Dr. Jack Daniels and Dr. Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Victor Perkins v. Jack Daniels, et al
as 23-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor Perkins
Defendant / Appellee:
Jack Daniels, Chief Psychiatrist and Dionne Hart, Staff Psychiatrist
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Jack Daniels and Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vess v. State of Washington
as 3:2017cv05700
Petitioner:
Jack Daniel Vess, II
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trumble v. Klamath Falls City Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00502
Defendant:
Daniel Banderas, Isa Daibes, Lt. Jack Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Trumble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedric Alexander v. Barcardi and Company, et al
as 16-11717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC MARK ALEXANDER, On behalf of self and all others similarly situated, also known as Sidric Mark Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
BARCARDI AND COMPANY, MCCORMICK DISTILLING COMPANY, DIAGEO BEVERAGE and others
Alexander v. Barcardi and Company et al
as 3:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Cedric Mark Alexander
Defendant:
Barcardi and Company, McCormick Distilling Co, Diageo Beverage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
