Cases 1 - 10 of 387
Klumpp v. Washington County Courthouse et al
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael Klumpp
Defendant:
Washington County Courthouse, Jeff Jaeger and Officer Delmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILDEA v. JAEGER
as 3:2024cv04362
Plaintiff:
HEATHER GILDEA
Defendant:
BRYAN JAEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
JAEGER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03887
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY JAEGER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blankenship v. Dudley et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blankenship
Defendant:
Joshua David Dudley and Brain Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Blankenship v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blankenship
Defendant:
Kaleb Johnson and Brian Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Blankenship v. McKillop et al
as 3:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blankenship
Defendant:
Christophor McKillop and Brain Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Opoku v. City of Tumwater et al
as 3:2024cv05167
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Opoku
Defendant:
City of Tumwater, Tumwater Police Department, Jon Weiks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moffett v. Jaeger
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Darius Darnell Moffett
Respondent:
Prairie du Chien Correctional Institution and Warden Peter J Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. SP Plus Parking Plus et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Abigail Armstrong
Defendant:
SP Plus Parking Plus and Jaeger Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jaeger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Cameron Jaeger
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
