Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hines v. Ford
as 13-2861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dashon Martel Hines
Defendant - Appellee:
Nathaniel Ford, James G. Giles and Buffalo City Police Department
Giles v. Earley
as 0:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
James A Giles
Defendant:
Curtis Earley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Giles v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03894
Plaintiff:
James R Giles
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giles v. Walls et al
as 0:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
James A Giles
Defendant:
Allen C Walls, Eillen Delany and Robert Poiletman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Giles v. Doctor Allan Wall
as 11-7156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLAN WALLS, Doctor, EILLEN DELANEY, Doctor, ROBERT POILETMAN, Doctor and others
Hines v. Ford et al
as 1:2012cv00998
Plaintiff:
Dashon Hines
Defendant:
Nathaniel Ford, James G. Giles and Buffalo City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Walls et al
as 0:2010cv00959
Plaintiff:
James A Giles
Defendant:
Allan Walls, Eillen Delaney, Robert Poiletman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
James W Giles and James W Giles
Defendant:
The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
