Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
Jailer James A. Daley, Lt. Hoyer, Maj. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zein v. Daley et al
as 2:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
Karim A. Zein
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Gatlin Daquan and Jailer James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Daley et al
as 2:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rodger Williams and Willow Williams
Defendant:
A. Shepard, Major Tate and James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Brashear v. James Daley, et al
as 19-5573
Defendant:
HEAD NURSE AMANDA [UNKNOWN], Individually, DR. [UNKNOWN] KALFES, Individually and CO D. STITSINGER
Defendant / Appellant:
WADE SENDELBACH and JAILER JAMES A. DALEY, Individually
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JASON DONALD BRASHEAR
Timothy Hollingsworth v. James Daley, et al
as 16-6626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WAYNE HOLLINGSWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. DALEY, KRISTA SLAYBACK, RENE BUNCH and others
Smith v. Campbell County, Kentucky et al
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
Campbell County, Kentucky, James A. Daley, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz-el-Bey v. Daley et al
as 2:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
King-Elikim-Najashi Shabazz-el-Bey
Defendant:
James A. Daley, G. Nagle, Zachery Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
