Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dickey v. Harris
as 4:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
James Everett Dickey
Defendant:
Bill Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43574
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD DICKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Texas Democratic Party et al v. Republican Party of Texas et al
as 1:2017cv01186
Defendant:
James R. Dickey, Rolando B. Pablos and Republican Party of Texas
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Hinojosa and Texas Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Republican Party of Texas et al v. Pablos
as 1:2017cv01167
Plaintiff:
James R. Dickey, Deborah Hovda and Republican Party of Texas
Defendant:
Rolando B. Pablos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
City of Boston et al v. Dickey et al
as 1:2017cv10791
Plaintiff:
City of Boston and Inspectional Services Department
Defendant:
James S. Dickey and East Fourth Street, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Dickey et al
as 1:2017cv10009
Plaintiff:
US Bank Trust, N.A.
Defendant:
James S. Dickey, Endeavor Capital Funding LLC and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Christine Samuel v. James H. Dickey
as 16-2352
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRISTINE SAMUEL, as Natural Parent and Guardian of CSD
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES H. DICKEY and JAMES H. DICKEY LAW FIRM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10649
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10473
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
