Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Beene et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Robert Beene , Antoni Gregory , John Harris and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04159
Plaintiff:
Janice Black and James Black
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00562
Plaintiff:
Janice Black and James Black
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer Holdings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Martini et al v. Rodin Rooyani et al
as 8:2015cv00219
Defendant:
Rodin Rooyani, George C. Zoley, Andrew Kishlock and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martini and Annette Martini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Black et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv31196
Plaintiff:
Jennifer R. Black and James Black
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black et al v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2012dp20831
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Black and James Black
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONROY v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv67123
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLACK CONROY
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION , CAREY CANADA INC , ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ables et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00463
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Yvonne Ables, Stephanie Yvonne Ables, All Plaintiffs and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
