Cases 41 - 50 of 67
BLACK et al v. BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD et al
as 1:2012cv06240
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLACK , MICHELE BLACK , SEMAJ BLACK and others
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD, LINDENWOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL MCCARTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aspen Insurance UK, Ltd. et al v. Absolute Return Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01491
Plaintiff:
Aspen Insurance UK, Ltd.
Defendant:
Absolute Return Solutions, Inc., James Black and Brian Decker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BLACK v. WARREN et al
as 1:2012cv03960
Petitioner:
JAMES BLACK
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Searles v. Board of Education
as 12-2452
Petitioner:
Suzanne Mersereau Searles
Respondent:
Board of Education, West Hartford, Paul Berkel, Natalie Schulman and others
Christopher Wills v. Charles Rosenberg
as 12-6690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ANDARYL WILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES PHILIP ROSENBERG, DONNA MARIE STEPHENSON, JOHN ROBERT STONE and others
Black et al v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2012dp20831
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Black and James Black
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black et al v. DePuy International Limited et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-20831
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Black and James Black
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
WILLS v. ROSENBERG et al
as 1:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Wills
Defendant:
Charles P. Rosenberg , Donna Marie Stephenson , John Robert Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Back v. CIR
as 11-73243
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BLACK
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04938
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
