Cases 1 - 10 of 27
McNair v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Defendant:
Matthew M. Gilmer, James Bowles, Justin D. Smallwood and others
Plaintiff:
Dentavia McNair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McNair v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Officer Justin D. Smallwood, Officer Matthew M. Gilmer and others
Plaintiff:
Dentavia McNair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mandriez Spivey v. Michael Breckon
as 24-6490
Defendant:
WANDA MCINTYRE, JAMES BOWLES, Lieutenant, USP Lee, THOMAS KIRBY and others
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Ramirez-de-Arellano et al v. Rob's Rentals, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv11431
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramirez-de-Arellano, Laura Ramirez-de-Arellano and CMR
Defendant:
Rob's Rentals, LLC, Robin Saganek and James Bowling, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Bowling v. DaVita, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
James Bowling
Defendant:
DaVita, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carlos Garcia v. James Bowles
as 22-7234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. JAMES BOWLES, LT. LIVELY, ACTIVE CAPTAIN, at that time and others
Bowles v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Bowles
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bowling v. DaVita, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03033
Plaintiff:
James Bowling
Defendant:
DaVita, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carson v. Wolfe Street Foundation Inc et al
as 4:2020cv00343
Defendant:
James Bowling, Vickie Siebenmorgen and Wolfe Street Foundation Inc
Plaintiff:
Arthur Carson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOWLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00518
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
