Cases 1 - 10 of 170
RICE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv04882
Defendant:
JOHN LANDIS, FRANCIS KELLY, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
as 0:2024cv01535
Petitioner:
David James Cook, SR
Respondent:
Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Muth v. Cooke
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Matthew Muth
Defendant:
James Cooke and James R. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31174
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26792
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24953
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04926
Plaintiff:
Tyress Davis, Chad Fisher, Joseph Golon Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Davis et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv08047
Plaintiff:
Tyress Davis, Chad Fisher, Joseph Golon Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
