Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Crowe v. Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2026cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office, FNU Graham, FNU Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. Creed et al
as 3:2026cv00110
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Joseph Creed, Andrew Bonfield, Victoria Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. Aramark et al
as 3:2026cv00057
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Aramark, John J. Zillmer, Jim Parangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. Muth et al
as 3:2025cv01019
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Brian Muth, John Riddick, Darren Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROWE v. BENTLEY et al
as 1:2025cv00929
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROWE
Defendant:
LT. BENTLEY, SGT. JACKSON, CO PUCKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. McFadden et al
as 3:2025cv00717
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
FNU Canty, FNU White, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2025cv00603
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Jermaine Lewis, Madison Guthrie, Brian Muth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14896
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crow v. Rasmussen et al
as 0:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Johnny James Crow
Defendant:
Eric Lee Rasmussen, Andrew Timothy Ruden and Minneapolis, City of, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crow et al v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
James Crow and Megan Crow
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
