Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Starke, Jr. v. Shipman et al
as 4:2021cv00394
Defendant:
Adam Pauyer, Kaft, Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Starke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Errington
as 21-60228
Defendant / Appellee:
South Mississippi Correctional Institution and Joe Errington, Superintendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Ferguson
Ferguson v. Errington et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Joe Errington and South Mississippi Correctional Institution
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celentano v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2020cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Colwart, Monica Thedford, Delhomme Randell and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
James Ferguson v. Bradley Ellis, et al
as 19-60165
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT ALMA WREN, OFFICER BRADLEY ELLIS, TONY DONALD, Unit #5 Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FERGUSON
Ferguson v. Pennington et al
as 3:2018cv00502
Defendant:
Charlayne D. Hall, Mary Dempsey and Richard Pennington
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Ferguson v. Tonya Morgan, et al
as 17-60703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TONYA MORGAN, JACKIE WILLIAMS, LEMARCUS RUFFIN and others
Roberson v. Ferguson et al
as 4:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Latonia Roberson
Defendant:
James Ferguson , Kosciusko Police Dept. and Mark Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Defendant:
Unknown Ellis, Unknown Williams, Frank Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Ferguson v. Jarita Biven
as 16-60298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JARITA BIVENS, Mississippi Department of Corrections Assistant Director Offender Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
