Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Romero v. Circle K Stores, Inc., et al.
as 1:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
Pete Romero
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. , James Grogan, Mark Stannebein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GROGAN v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01436
Petitioner:
DUSTYN JAMES GROGAN
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bornstein v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02385
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bornstein
Defendant:
The City of New York and James Grogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkinson et al v. Homecomings Financial LLC, et al
as 3:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Atkinson and Judy L. Atkinson
Defendant:
Executive Trustee Services, LLC, GMAC Mortgage, LLC, James Grogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Robert Carter v. James Grogan
as 10-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CARTER, Business Manager of International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 45
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GROGAN, on behalf of and in his capacity as General President of the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers
Carter v. Grogan
as 8:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert Carter
Defendant:
James Grogan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Cueto v. Thomas et al
as 3:2008cv00868
Plaintiff:
Amiel Cueto
Defendant:
Robert Thomas, Lloyd A Karmeier, Rita Garman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
