Cases 21 - 30 of 57
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93768
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv74495
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRENCE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE
Defendant:
James Harper, KEITH STRAUB, GENE GRAPPERHAUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Tony Harper, et al v. City of Dallas, Texas, et al
as 19-11106
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS and BRIAN ROWDEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA HARPER, individually and for the benefit of all statutory beneficiaries of James Harper and as the executor of the Estate of James Harper, TONY S. HARPER and K. H., a minor by and through her mother and guardian Ashlee Whadley
Harper v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00221
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRENCE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE
Defendant:
JAMES HARPER, KEITH STRAUB, GENE GRAPPERHAUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2017cv00929
Petitioner:
JASON JAMES HARPER
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Harper, Jr. v. Anne Carter
as 15-6877
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES HARPER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
ANNE MARY CARTER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
