Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Jackson v. Ettain Group, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00622
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
Ettain Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. USA
as 8:2017cv00618
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nicholas James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09084
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jackson and James Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13739
Plaintiff:
Kelley Jackson and James Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morning v. Dillon County et al
as 4:2015cv03349
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Morning
Defendant:
Dillon County , Dillon County Sheriff's Office , Major Hulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sneed v. KBR, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01568
Defendant:
KBR, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc and KBR Technical Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven C Snee, Vincent Molino, Larry Engle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15852
Plaintiff:
Frances Jackson and James Jackson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Beckley Department of Motor Vehicles
as 5:2014cv09173
Plaintiff:
James Jackson, III
Defendant:
Beckley Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPhetridge et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08281
Plaintiff:
Kimberly McPhetridge and James Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meeks et al v. Virginia Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2012cv00446
Plaintiff:
Danny Meeks , Christopher Anuswith , Donna Bradshaw and others
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Transportation and Elizabeth River Crossings OPCO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
