Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jarrett et al v. Bozeman
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jarrett and James Jarrett
Defendant:
Zachary Bozeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Hanus et al v. Arkema Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03102
Plaintiff:
SARAH SMITH, JAMES "JARRETT" HANUS, LESLEE GREEN and others
Defendant:
ARKEMA INC., Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., RICHARD RENNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jarrett v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00180
Petitioner:
Edward James Jarrett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jarrett v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02934
Plaintiff:
James Jarrett
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrett et al v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Jarrett and Jackie Jarrett
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. James Jarrett
as 13-5825
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES JARRETT
Jarrett et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04837
Plaintiff:
Linda Joyce Jarrett and James Jarrett
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jarrett v. Thomas et al
as 6:2013cv00442
Petitioner:
Brandon James Jarrett
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seth Baker, et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 12-35946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SETH BAKER, MATTHEW DANZIG, JESSE BERNSTEIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Seth Baker, et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 12-80085
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
SETH BAKER, JESSE BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW DANZIG and others
Defendant - Respondent:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
