Cases 1 - 10 of 373
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv02634
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv03229
Plaintiff:
Jamie Phillips
Defendant:
James Johnson, Joseph Gwaltney, Tyson Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gant (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv02086
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryan Gant
Defendant:
James Johnson, Wite, Intel. Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMullan v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Artez McMullan
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, James Johnson, Paul Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gantt v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gantt
Defendant:
James Johnson, Larry Winegardner, Thomas Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
