Cases 1 - 10 of 226
King v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01692
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James King
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kyle James King
Defendant:
Steven Johnson, Sgt Furgason, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eakins v. Austin Lloyd, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Annamarie F Eakins and Annamarie F. Eakins
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc, Austin Coins, Inc., Brandon E Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nowell v. Austin Coins, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nowell
Defendant:
Austin Coins, Inc, Eric P Lesak, Timothy James King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Richard Wershe, Jr. v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD WERSHE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, WILLIAM JASPER, KEVIN GREENE and others
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30626
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Keyes
as 3:2023cv00667
Petitioner:
James King
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02267
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. MASON et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
JENNIFER MASON, DIXON and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
