Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Martin, Jr. et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 9:2023cv80496
Plaintiff:
James Martin, Jr. and Edith Martin
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James Martin, Jr. v. M. King
as 23-6200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN M. L. KING, MS. BROWN-STROBEE, YVONNE LANE and others
James Martin, Jr. v. Andrew Comer
as 22-6933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW COMER
Martin v. King et al
as 5:2022ct03226
Plaintiff:
James Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden M.L. King, Ms. Brown-Strobee, Yvonne Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05745
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTIN, JR. and JAMES MARTIN, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Martin
as 21-60254
Defendant / Appellant:
James Martin, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Martin v. Leu et al
as 5:2021ct03049
Defendant:
Warden D. Leu, Cathy Carlock and Andrew Comer
Plaintiff:
James Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Envision Imaging et al
as 4:2019cv01274
Defendant:
Envision Imaging and Kristen Ethridge
Plaintiff:
James Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02644
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamore Danek USA, Inc
Plaintiff:
James Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis Martin, Jr. v. City of Temple, Texas, et al
as 12-50844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS JAMES MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS, RICHARD THERRIAULT, WAYNE DAWSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
