Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wainscott v. Member Select Insurance Company et al
as 6:2022cv00215
Defendant:
Julia Marie Lorencz, James Morrow, Member Select Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Wainscott and Paula Wainscott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pettit v. Morrow et al
as 2:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Glenn Thivener, James Morrow, Kenneth Dale and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Hines v. City of Columbus, Ohio, et al
as 16-3333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH HINES
Defendant:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, KIMBERLEY JACOBS, RICHARD BASH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DEWITT
Hines v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hines
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Kimberley Jacobs, Richard Bash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard Franks v. State of Arizona, et al
as 13-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD DAVID FRANKS, aka Lenny Franks, aka D. Cutler
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, JANICE BREWER, Governor, THOMAS CHARLES HORN, Arizona Attorney General and others
Franks v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv10088
Plaintiff:
Leonard David Franks
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Jan Brewer , Thomas Charles Horn and others
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Morrow et al
as 3:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
James Morrow and TJSWS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Abdul-Salim et al v. Turner et al
as 3:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Sadiq Hafiz Abdul-Salim and Yahya Bilal Muhammad Siddiq
Defendant:
Ron Turner, Catherine Posey, Debra Inglis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley v. Hodge et al
as 1:2011cv00251
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
Reuben Hodge, Toni Miller, James Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Nichols v. James Morrow
as 11-5413
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFERY S. NICHOLS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES MORROW, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
