Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Munoz v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al
as 6:2015cv00072
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company and James Pearson
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Amoroso, Vince v. Schuh, Dale et al
as 3:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Vince Amoroso
Defendant:
Dale R. Schuh, Kenneth Erler, Peter McPartland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams Holding Corporation v. Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Williams Holding Corporation
Defendant:
Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC, James Pearson, Larry A. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. USA
as 3:2014cv04436
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert James Pearson White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pearson v. Hetzel, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Willie Pearson
as 14-6003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIE JAMES PEARSON
Pina-Rodriquez v. Burroughs et al
as 2:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jairo Pina-Rodriquez
Defendant:
George Briant , Jose A. Ramos , James Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pearson v. Patterson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00454
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breaux et al v. Harco National Insurance Company et al
as 3:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Brittany Breaux and Michael Breaux
Defendant:
Harco National Insurance Company, J-Max Transportation Services, Inc. and James Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Robert White
as 12-4399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES PEARSON WHITE, a/k/a RJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
