Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Roberts v. Moore et al
as 3:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Byron Roberts
Defendant:
James R. Moore, Board of Supervisors of Kemper County, Mississippi and Nathan Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Acklin et al v. Eichner et al
as 1:2020cv07042
Plaintiff:
Jatinder K Aggarwal, John A Taylor, Susan O'Neill and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Rodney M Bickford
Defendant:
New York Urban Ownership Management LLC, Ian Bruce Eichner, O. Park Central LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Wright v. Moore et al
as 3:2020cv00473
Defendant:
Sheriff James R. Moore, Kemper County, Mississippi, John Doe 1- 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Dorsyl Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv02671
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James R Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grace v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
LaBrandon Grace
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, James R. Moore, Robert Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2018cv01224
Petitioner:
JAMES R. MOORE
Respondent:
LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adesanya, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2016cv00925
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gloria Adesanya , Khadija Ahmad , Kaii Almeida-Falcones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2015cv05043
Petitioner:
JAMES R. MOORE
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holliman v. Estes et al
as 7:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Noodaeng P. Holliman
Defendant:
Alcie Estes, William P Estes, Mesquite Properties, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
