Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Ky State police post #4 et al
as 3:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
William Jo Tucker
Defendant:
Ky State police post #4 and James Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Defendant:
James Richardson, Jamie Underwood and Britenny Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Defendant:
James Richardson, Grant Stephen, Brad Girard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Miller
as 1:2022cv06606
Petitioner:
James Richardson
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galvin v. Rosenbaum et al
as 4:2019cv00615
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Deborah Leff, Kevin Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv04472
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES RICHARDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richardson v. Richmond et al
as 2:2017cv01610
Defendant:
J. Duchek, R. Parker, Richmond and others
Plaintiff:
James Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Beamer et al
as 2:2017cv01097
Defendant:
Dr. Beamer and Nurse Root
Plaintiff:
James Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester-Bey v. Donaruma
as 17-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Hester-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
Jesse Donaruma, U.S. Marshal, Joseph Pitruzzello, Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshal, John Doe, New York City Police Officers 1-2 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
