Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rourke v. USAF et al
as 4:2023cv40013
Plaintiff:
James Rourke
Defendant:
USAF and CIA Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mays v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2021cv02382
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, The, Sherburne County, Elk River City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv04860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rourke v. Carter, et al
as 19-2256
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY CARTER, President and US AIR FORCE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ROURKE
Rourke v. Carter et al
as 4:2019cv40052
Defendant:
USAF and President Jimmy Carter
Plaintiff:
James Rourke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Rourke v. United States Air Force
as 4:2017cv40162
Plaintiff:
James Rourke
Defendant:
United States Air Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
RUCKER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
REGINALD RUCKER , DARLENE RUCKER , JAMES ROURKE and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rucker et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2011cv09538
Plaintiff:
Reginald Rucker , Darlene Rucker , James Rourke and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paul H. Shield MD Inc. Profit, et al v. Northfield Laboratories Inc., et al
as 10-8020
Petitioner:
PAUL H. SHIELD MD INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, PAUL H. SHIELD MD INC. MONEY PURCHASE PLAN, ALAN GOODMAN and others
Respondent:
NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES INC., STEVEN A. GOULD and RICHARD E. DEWOSKIN
Lee et al v. Keyes et al
as 3:2009cv01309
Plaintiff:
Young Ja Lee and Sung Kang Lee
Defendant:
Travis Keyes, James Rourke, Jennifer Rourke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
