Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sharp v. Towarnicki et al
as 7:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Sharp
Defendant:
Leon Towarnicki, Chad Martin and Alison B. Linas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Shiflett et al
as 2:2021cv00244
Defendant:
Medlin, Mark Shiflett and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27898
Plaintiff:
Sharon Sharpe and James Sharpe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Sharpe v. South Carolina Department
as 14-7582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JAMES SHARPE, a/k/a James Martin Sharpe, a/k/a James Sharpe
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCDC, WILLIAM AKERMAN, SCDC Dental Director, DR. UBAH, Dentist Lee CI and others
Sharpe v. Richardson et al
as 4:2014cv01841
Plaintiff:
Martin James Sharpe
Defendant:
LT F Richardson, LT Butrbaugh and Warden Willie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2013cv01538
Plaintiff:
Martin James Sharpe
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, William Akerman, Unknown Dentist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
John Black v. New Jersey
as 09-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. BLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY, Government, CITY OF NEWARK, a municipal corporation of the state of New Jersey, RONALD RICE, New Jersey State Senator and others
Black v. New Jersey Government et al
as 5:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
John D. Black
Defendant:
New Jersey Government, City of Newark, Ronald Rice and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sharpe v. Rushton
as 4:2007cv01463
Petitioner:
Martin James Sharpe
Respondent:
Warden Collie Rushton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
