Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ozie Hall, Jr. v. Matthew Liles
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
OZIE L. HALL, JR.
Defendant:
MATTHEW L. LILES, individually and as Assistant Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, JAMES STEVEN BASS, individually and as Assistant State Auditor of the State of North Carolina, ALEXENDRA S. SCHAUSS, individually and as Director of the Division of School Business, N.C. Department of Public Instruction and others
Cardoza v. Myers et al
as 7:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jose Corral Cardoza
Defendant:
James Steven Myers, DOT Family Holdings, LLC and DOT Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hall v. Liles et al
as 5:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Ozie L. Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew L. Liles, James Steven Bass, Alexendra S. Schauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
James Steven Jackson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nutter v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv24185
Plaintiff:
James Steven Nutter
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. James Lesane
as 13-7114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES STEVEN LESANE
US v. James Steven Lesane
as 12-8158
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES STEVEN LESANE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
