Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Jordan v. City of San Antonio, et al.
as 5:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
James Walton Jordan and James Walton Jordan, III
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, city of san antonio police department, franklin mc blain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walton v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv02795
Petitioner:
James Walton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WALTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20067
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
WALTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13355
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walton v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06171
Plaintiff:
James Walton
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Catherine J. Friedman, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
FUHR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03577
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALTON FUHR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walton v. Fikes
as 0:2022cv00506
Petitioner:
James Walton and James Earl Walton
Respondent:
Jeffrey Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al.
as 1:2021cv04660
Plaintiff:
James Walton
Defendant:
Ethicon US LLC, Ethicon Inc., Ethicon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al.
as 1:2021cv08633
Plaintiff:
James Walton
Defendant:
Ethicon US LLC, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walton v. People of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv00544
Defendant:
United Nation Headquarter, Prizker, Cook County Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Willie James Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
