Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49161
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WOODROW BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. USA
as 4:2020cv00113
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JAMES WOODROW WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James WilsonIn re: James Wilson
as 20-10904
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES WOODROW WILSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parrish v. Garrett
as 4:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
James Woodrow Parrish
Defendant:
Wilma Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodrow v. South Carolina et al
as 6:2010mc00156
Plaintiff:
James Woodrow
Defendant:
State Of South Carolina, Pickens County, Blue Ridge Electric Co Op Inc and others
MARKUS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG WORLD CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv87877
Plaintiff:
JAMES WOODROW MARKUS and MARY MARKUS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG WORLD CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARKUS v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv87445
Plaintiff:
JAMES WOODROW MARKUS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
AUSTIN et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66089
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LEON AUSTIN, VIRGINIA AUSTIN, JOHNNY THOMAS BASKIN and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
