Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Morris v. Centrion et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff: Arealeus Morris
Defendant: Centrion, Dr. Figrola, Nurse North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff: LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant: JANE 1 DOE, JANE 2 DOE, JANE 3 DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00522
Plaintiff: JERMAINE C. BRADLEY
Defendant: BYRD, CLARKE, K. HOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00279
Plaintiff: TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant: ROBERT CARTER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00867
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
McFadden v. Latona et al
as 6:2021cv06513
Plaintiff: Reginald G. McFadden
Defendant: L. Latona, John or Jane #1 Doe, John or Jane #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chittick v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03252
Defendant: Steve Meeks, Jane 3 Doe, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff: Nicholas Chittick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maples v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv00510
Plaintiff: Ryan Maples
Defendant: Jane (1) Doe, Jane (2) Doe and Jane (3) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nyah Tchami William et al v. AES Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00343
Plaintiff: Nyah Tchami William, Business Group 4, Business Group 2 and others
Defendant: AES Sonel, Actis Capital LLP and AES Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2178
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?