Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Doe et al v. Horry County Schools et al
as 4:2021cv03320
Plaintiff: Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant: Horry County Schools, Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner: Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent: Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benjamin Leibelson v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 16-2215
Plaintiff - Appellee: BENJAMIN LEIBELSON
Defendant - Appellant: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., individually and as Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, LOUIS C. EICHENLAUB, individually and as Deputy Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, JOHN F. CARAWAY, individually and as Regional Director, Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Defendant: EDWIN K. CAULEY, individually and as Warden, FCI McDowell, WV, JOHN DOES 1-3, individually and as Federal Corrections Officers, FCI Beckley, WV, JOHN ROES 1-3, individually and as Federal Corrections Administrative, Director of Management Personnel, FCI Beckley, Wv and others
H v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2016cv02224
Plaintiff: K H
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Social Services , Anna Jones , Pheshe Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlow Humbert v. Baltimore City Police Dept
as 15-2461
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLOW HUMBERT
Defendant - Appellee: BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FREDERICK BEALEFELD, Police Commissioner Individually and as Police Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department, SHEILA DIXON, former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, in her individual capacity and others
Defendant: MICHAEL BRASSELL, Police Officer Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, CINESE CALDWELL, Laboratory Technician individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, DOMINICK GRIFFIN, Detective Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Leibelson v. Samuels, et. al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv12863
Plaintiff: Benjamin Leibelson
Defendant: Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Louis C. Eichenlaub, John F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlow Humbert v. Mayor and City Council of Balt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1768
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLOW HUMBERT
Defendant - Appellee: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, SHEILA DIXON, former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, in her individual capacity, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant: CHRIS JONES, Detective Sergeant Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department, MARTIN O'MALLEY, Individually and as Governor of the State of Maryland and former Mayor of the City of Baltimore, KEITH MERRYMAN, Detective Individually and as Police Officer, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Ho v. Fairfax County, Virginia et al
as 1:2015cv00483
Plaintiff: Quan A. Ho
Defendant: Fairfax County, Virginia, Stacey Kincaid, Stan Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dale v. Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02152
Plaintiff: Jerome Dale
Defendant: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, The Baltimore City Police Department, Anthony Batts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrie Johnson v. Baltimore City Police Dept We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant: TORRIE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FREDERICK BEALEFELD, Police Commissioner Individually and as Police Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department, ADAM LONG, Police Officer, Sequence #F648 Individually and as a Police Officer of the Baltimore City Police Department and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?