Cases 1 - 10 of 15
THOMAS v. LESCHT et al
as 1:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
JANET THOMAS
Defendant:
ALAN LESCHT and JACK BRADLEY JARRETT, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Janet Thomas-Johnson v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2022cv01176
Plaintiff:
Janet Thomas-Johnson
Defendant:
County of Riverside and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
THOMAS et al v. KENT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2021cv01554
Plaintiff:
JANET THOMAS and LAWRENCE THOMAS
Defendant:
KENT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: New York City Board of
as 20-903
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Janet Thomas
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02898
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas and Janet Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv05013
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Janet Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-18351
Plaintiff:
Janet Thomas and Edward Thomas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc.
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv18351
Plaintiff:
Janet Thomas and Edward Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. New York Life Insurance Company
as 6:2012cv01728
Plaintiff:
Janet Thomas
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
