Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Boykin v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Boykin
Defendant:
US Postal Service and Jarvis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. IRS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Williams
Defendant:
IRS, NAACP Representatives, NAACP Administrater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acheampong v. Worden & Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02373
Plaintiff:
Juliet Acheampong
Defendant:
Worden & Associates, LLC, Joshua Samuel Mirel, Jarvis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jarvis Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06773
Defendant:
Does and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Williams
Williams v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06585
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Williams
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jarvis Williams
as 16-11706
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JARVIS WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Fat Twin
Williams v. Jennifer Enterprises Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04699
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Williams
Defendant:
Jennifer Enterprises Inc, Julie's Tire Service Inc and Rafael Mendiola
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Jesse White Tumbling Team, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05696
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jesse White Tumbling Team, Inc., Unknown Agents of Jesse White Tumbling Team, Inc. and Jarvis Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
William v. Hagan
as 2:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jarvis William
Defendant:
Bonnie Leggatt Hagan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
