Cases 1 - 10 of 221
CHESTER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL CHESTER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 6:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman USP and Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 5:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Schaefer
as 24-663
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON PAUL SCHAEFER
White v. USA
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jason Paul White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gill et al v. Cauthorn et al
as 3:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Gill and Kimberly Elliott
Defendant:
City-Parish of East Baton Rouge, Town of Addis, David Lee Cauthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul McKinney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PAUL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33049
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEIL v. TATE et al.
as 3:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL NEIL
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, DEPUTY WARDEN EDMUNDSON, LIEUTENANT FOGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
