Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Eradio Hernandez v. City of Montclair et al
as 5:2026cv00149
Plaintiff:
ERADIO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
City of Montclair, CHIEF OF POLICE JASON REED, POLICE OFFICER JESSE JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spears et al v. St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2025cv00426
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Spears and LeRoy Spears
Defendant:
St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, Jamie Reed and Jason Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White Mountain v. Jordan et al
as 0:2025cv00164
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Dingham, Special Agent Kendra Holloway, Jason Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie White Mountain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White Mountain v. Jordan et al
as 5:2024cv00690
Defendant:
Raquel Franklin, Tara Michelle Gromatka, Gary Knouse and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie White Mountain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pitts v. Forrest County, et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Defendant:
Shane Lamar Boyle, Forrest County, Officer Jason Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewitt Pitts
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Reed v. USA
as 1:2023cv00910
Petitioner:
Jason Reed
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
