Cases 11 - 20 of 140
Jones v. Oregon Department of Transportation
as 2:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Logan Jay Jones
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Oregon Department of Transportation
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
Logan Jay Jones
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyde v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tristan Michael Hyde
Defendant:
The County of Lee, Alabama, Jay Jones, Lee County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashmore v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00845
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ennis v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00639
Plaintiff:
Derrill Richard Ennis
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Corey Welch, Timothy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony McQueen, Jr.
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Corey Welch, Timothy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Walker et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Jacob A. Walker, III and Steven T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Marquerious Laquez Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ashmore v. Lee County Dentention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Steward Hill, Lt. Jones, Lee County Dentention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
