Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
William Curtis v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Commissioner Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J. BIRMINGHAM, PSS, T. BOLTON, PSS and others
Defendant:
STEWART, LAUREL R. HARRY, Department of Corrections Secretary, FRANCIS J. FEILD, PSS and others
Alan Presbury v. Michael Wenerowicz, et al
as 21-3206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN PRESBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, CYNTHIA LINK, THOMAS DOHMAN and others
Seliger v. Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04414
Defendant:
Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Seliger
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bulgari S.p.A. et al v. Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06878
Defendant:
Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc., Rouge Jardin Jewelry, LLC d/b/a CZ By Kenneth Jay Lane and Rouge Jardin Jewelry, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bulgari Corporation of America and Bulgari S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lane #70772 v. Ryan
as 2:2018cv02270
Plaintiff:
Lyndle Jay Lane
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEPLER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv00446
Plaintiff:
MICAH HEPLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JAMES BARNACLE, JAY LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUBERT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv00354
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUBERT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JAY LANE , TIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2017cv01237
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBRA A. HAWKINBERRY, WILLIAM TIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
